In the 110th Congress, 59 senators and 174 representatives were also lawyers. You'd think that our national body of lawmakers, especially those who are also lawyers, might know something about the law, about judges and about courts of appeal. Apparently you'd never get these dolts to actually ADMIT it, though, because it might cramp their style when they have to tell the big lies about the other party's judicial nominees.
If Republicans want to paint Sonia Sotomayor as a liberal and/or activist judge, let them show the cases in detail that might suggest this. Let them also step aside after slinging their mud so that others might talk about the rest of Sotomayor's decisions that the Republicans weren't able to spin to their advantage so that we could actually have a reasoned debate on the topic.
Let every Republican who praised Alito's humble upbringing and said it would make him a better justice who understood the "real world" stand up after videotape of their remarks about Alito are played and say why this same standard shouldn't apply to a latina who had better grades than Alito and more years on the federal bench than he had when he was nominated. If even one elected official has the balls to do that, I might admire their ability to lie as much as I despise their willingness to do so.
I shouldn't even bother to be upset about it. No big scandals have turned up so far, so it looks like her nomination is likely to be confirmed. Still, it's galling to see the same people who huffed and puffed and cried "Politics!" about any suggestion that Democrats might not support Alito turn around and threaten filibusters and focus on irrelevant minutiae when a qualified, experienced, intelligent judge is nominated by a president who scares them as much as W scared sane people.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
Bill Maher last night had John Bolton on. He frightens me more every time I see he him. He's really good at rhetoric and remaining substance free.
When talking about Sotomayor he brought up her speech and said she didn't understand the oath she took as a judge to be blind to the positions of the plaintiffs and defendants. Someone else asked him to name one case of her where this happened and listed several cases where she ruled against the minority. Bolton shout back "So speeches don't count! Because they sure counted with me" Of course he didn't have cases he decided and his jobs involved giving speeches.
Also the people that bring up Ricci use it to show that she's for quotas. Of course New Haven found that since all the people who did well on their test were white so perhaps something was wrong with it as Title VII states. It's usually the same people that say that since Obama's 4 top picks were all women that he was obviously looking to post a minority and not the best qualified. If the results seem skewed, maybe they are. Is there something wrong with that?
Post a Comment